I don't have a good link for the Vegas threads issue, but there are some discussions on the Vegas forum. Since my cpu and ram aren't being stressed at all, i imagine it's either a bad setting in the project / software or the gpu being relatively old and slow, so If i invest 660 euros to get the asus nvidia gt圆80 2gb ram which is a beast, ASUS - Graphics Cards- ASUS GTX680-2GD5 will i see any worthy difference or will it be money thrown away? Would it be better strictly for video applications (i am not dealing with graphics or animation) to opt for quadro? 'Cause sony shows otherwise in their gpu benchmark site which i linked above.
Neat video sony vegas pro#
Take a look at this Vegas Pro 11 GPU acceleration Nor does exporting to interlaced makes it go any faster. I have gpu acceleration (using the latest option in vegas pro 11 and cuda cores) enabled but even if i turn it off, it doesn't change a thing.
Neat video sony vegas 1080p#
My problem is that when i render at MPEG2-Blu-ray 1080p it needs 25 hours to export the project!ĭuring render, Cpu load is average 30-40% which is nothing and ram is 8gb-ram. Sont hsl correction for desaturating the colors Sony color curves for brightness and contrast The project is 2 hours long and has the following video fx: I have shot a live band playing with my Sony HVR-HD1000E at 1080-50i Normal sata-2 hard disk drives at 7200rpm, western digital I7 2600k asus-stock-overclocked at 3.4ghz, 8core I've been having some off problems lately, and i want your opinions:
0 kommentar(er)
